There's no denying that Gary Parsons' and Keith Kavajecz's past lives swayed their current fishing fascinations. To wit, the brainy pair of professional walleye anglers have turned into technophiles of the highest order, embracing high-powered modern electronics and underwater cameras to find fish and gauge their attitudes, among other priorities, in the campaign to catch them. Leave it to Parsons, a science-besotted dentist who graduated at the top of his class, and Kavajecz, a computer programmer who wrote code at IBM, to deftly transition into alternate on-the-water careers aided and abetted by their analytical minds.

"We've applied a scientific approach to everything we do," says Parsons, who has won three In-Fisherman Professional Walleye Trail (PWT) tournaments, a trifecta matched by his alter ego, Kavajecz, whose accomplishments include a 2002 PWT Championship victory on the Missouri River. "Our success in fishing is because of the combination of our educational backgrounds and work experience."

So it goes for a dynamic duo who scout walleyes with Lowrance electronics and Atlantis underwater cameras, playing one technology off the other to locate walleyes, judge their mood du jour and ascertain the optimum patterns to make them open sesame. Theirs is hard-won wisdom that earns them big baskets and not inconsiderable PWT winnings. Whether the goals are competitive or recreational proficiency, you too can parlay P&K's strategies into wiser, more perceptive walleye sleuthing and, therefore, better fishing.

ONE WAY OR ANOTHER...

Despite all their similarities, Parsons and Kavajecz have divergent approaches when searching for walleyes and, subsequently, figuring out how to catch them. For his part, Parsons puts a greater emphasis on his sonar than on his underwater camera.

One place, in particular, for the sonar's utility sans camera is on the spacious Great Lakes. "From an open-water searching standpoint, the camera is a dead-end street," Parsons says. "It's very difficult to lower your camera and get meaningful pictures of walleyes."

Think about it: Schools scatter over miles of open water, often well away from structure, on Lake Erie or Lake Huron's Saginaw Bay. Letting out a camera cord to achieve the exact depth, and waiting for a fleeting image of a walleye, are downright painstaking. Besides, if images on sonar are walleyes, Parsons figures he can forego scoping with the camera and focus on trying to catch the target species or even some of the undesirables, to determine what he's dealing with.

To explore efficiently with electronics rather than frittering away time trolling over miles of nothingness, Parsons switches into high-speed search mode with specific settings on his Lowrance LCX-111C HD. (For detailed instructions, see sidebar, "Sonar Sleuthing" on the next page.)

Around structure, the difference between Parsons' and Kavajecz's methodologies becomes more apparent. While Parsons starts with sonar and yields to the camera almost as a last resort if he can't catch what he's marking, Kavajecz employs camera and sonar simultaneously.

Because Kavajecz keeps the lens near enough to bottom to see it at all times, the drill can get a little dicey: He says he sheared off three camera cords last year. But what his camera use achieves with meticulous viewing takes time. And what he gains in thoroughness, he sacrifices in time spent. Kavajecz might gain an in-depth understanding of three spots, when Parsons perhaps checks 20 or more during a day of tournament prefishing.